<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://blog.torproject.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>packaging errors</title>
 <link>http://blog.torproject.org/category/tags/packaging-errors</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Updates on Tor 0.2.0.32 for OS X Users</title>
 <link>http://blog.torproject.org/blog/updates-tor-0.2.0.32-os-x-users</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As detailed here, &lt;a href=&quot;http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Dec-2008/msg00044.html&quot; title=&quot;http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Dec-2008/msg00044.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Dec-2008/msg00044.html&lt;/a&gt;, there are some packaging fixes for OS X users in this 0.2.0.32 stable release.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;For OS X users, there is a packaging bugfix in 0.2.0.32 labelled as&lt;br /&gt;
0.2.0.32a in the available packages.  It turns out for years we&#039;ve been&lt;br /&gt;
shipping a Info.plist with an incorrect key.  The issue was discovered&lt;br /&gt;
and reported as bug 876,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://bugs.torproject.org/flyspray/index.php?id=876&amp;amp;do=details&quot; title=&quot;https://bugs.torproject.org/flyspray/index.php?id=876&amp;amp;do=details&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://bugs.torproject.org/flyspray/index.php?id=876&amp;amp;do=details&lt;/a&gt;.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The commit to fix the problem in the 0_2_0 branch is r17472:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://archives.seul.org/or/cvs/Dec-2008/msg00037.html&quot; title=&quot;http://archives.seul.org/or/cvs/Dec-2008/msg00037.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://archives.seul.org/or/cvs/Dec-2008/msg00037.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The commit to fix the problem in the Vidalia 0.1 branch is r3361:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://trac.vidalia-project.net/browser/vidalia/branches/vidalia-0.1/pkg/osx?order=date&amp;amp;desc=1&quot; title=&quot;http://trac.vidalia-project.net/browser/vidalia/branches/vidalia-0.1/pkg/osx?order=date&amp;amp;desc=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://trac.vidalia-project.net/browser/vidalia/branches/vidalia-0.1/pkg...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The bug is that the OS X Installer will prompt &quot;The chosen volume&lt;br /&gt;
contains software which is newer then [sic] the software you are&lt;br /&gt;
installing.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem is that the Installer looks in the file&lt;br /&gt;
/Library/Receipts/Vidalia.pkg/Contents/Info.plist for&lt;br /&gt;
CFBundleShortVersionString.  We mistakenly called it&lt;br /&gt;
CFBundleSortVersionString, which Apple inserts &quot;1&quot; as the value.  The&lt;br /&gt;
upgrade to Vidalia from 0.1.9 to 0.1.10 apparently triggered the issue.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fix is to put the correct value in place for the future.  The&lt;br /&gt;
simplest way to do this is to have the users click &quot;Continue&quot; when&lt;br /&gt;
prompted.  We could have spent a lot of time trying to fix it for the&lt;br /&gt;
user to hide the issue, but well, that is fraught with problems and&lt;br /&gt;
complexities.  A simple click of &quot;Continue&quot; is far simpler and less&lt;br /&gt;
error prone.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The difference between the released 0.2.0.32 Tor code is the inclusion&lt;br /&gt;
of r17472.  It&#039;s not really 0.2.0.32a per se, but since we lack package&lt;br /&gt;
versions, I had to distinguish it in some way. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://blog.torproject.org/blog/updates-tor-0.2.0.32-os-x-users#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://blog.torproject.org/category/tags/apple-os-x">apple os x</category>
 <category domain="http://blog.torproject.org/category/tags/packaging-errors">packaging errors</category>
 <category domain="http://blog.torproject.org/category/tags/stable-release">stable release</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:48:00 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>phobos</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70 at http://blog.torproject.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
